In and amongst lot of reading last week, a small piece of information has continued to return and pester my understanding and it seems particularly pertinent after the last (re)visitings entries:
the greek root of the word ecology is oikos which means house
and the definition of ecology in the Concise Oxford English Dictionary is: the branch of biology concerned with the relations of organisms to one another and to their physical surroundings.
This feels significant though I am not entirely sure why - it suggests that the study of relations of organisms to each other and their environment might begin at home, with dwelling, with family, with community; yet this rather closed environment of house and home seems somehow to contradict the meaning of ecology as a wide multiplicity of connections, mutabilities and mutual dependencies.
--------------
With a nod to a future (re)visiting of performance and installation at Stapleton Road railway station, I was catching a train there last week and found this attached to the fence of a community garden which now takes up a disused part of the station.
Sunday, 28 November 2010
Saturday, 20 November 2010
(re)visitings - molecular proximity and ethics
here are three extracts from Jane Bennett's The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings and Ethics
these are the words of nanoscientist B.C. Crandall:
In watery solutions such as those found in the interior of most plants and animals, the general jostling caused by thermal excitation bumps protein sized molecules into each other from all angles very rapidly. This bumbling, stumbling dance allows molecules to explore all possible "mating" configurations with the other molecules in their local environment. By variously constraining and controlling such wild interactions, biological systems generate the event we call life. And it is exactly this mechanism of molecular self-assembly that may lead to the construction of complex structures designed by human engineers. (86)
Crandall and Epicurus together call to mind the Deleuzian claim that if one is to become otherwise than one is, one must place oneself in "molecular proximity" to alien bodies. One might, for example, try to explore one's nonhuman animality by experimenting with dogginess. Recall that for Deleuze and Guattari, becoming a dog is not merely a matter of imitation, but rather of making "your organism enter into composition with something else in such a way that the particles emitted from the aggregate thus composed will be canine as a function of the relation of movement and rest, or of molecular proximity, into which they enter. "(86)
So what kind of ethical project emerges from a (meta)physical imaginary of animate matter, as distilled from the writings of Epicurus, Lucretius, nanotechnology and Deleuze?....
As Stephen White notes, an ontological imaginary does not "determine categorically" a specific set of ethical judgements but rather "helps engender certain dispositions toward an ethical-political life that alter the affective and cognitive direction one takes on specific issues" (87)
these are the words of nanoscientist B.C. Crandall:
In watery solutions such as those found in the interior of most plants and animals, the general jostling caused by thermal excitation bumps protein sized molecules into each other from all angles very rapidly. This bumbling, stumbling dance allows molecules to explore all possible "mating" configurations with the other molecules in their local environment. By variously constraining and controlling such wild interactions, biological systems generate the event we call life. And it is exactly this mechanism of molecular self-assembly that may lead to the construction of complex structures designed by human engineers. (86)
Crandall and Epicurus together call to mind the Deleuzian claim that if one is to become otherwise than one is, one must place oneself in "molecular proximity" to alien bodies. One might, for example, try to explore one's nonhuman animality by experimenting with dogginess. Recall that for Deleuze and Guattari, becoming a dog is not merely a matter of imitation, but rather of making "your organism enter into composition with something else in such a way that the particles emitted from the aggregate thus composed will be canine as a function of the relation of movement and rest, or of molecular proximity, into which they enter. "(86)
So what kind of ethical project emerges from a (meta)physical imaginary of animate matter, as distilled from the writings of Epicurus, Lucretius, nanotechnology and Deleuze?....
As Stephen White notes, an ontological imaginary does not "determine categorically" a specific set of ethical judgements but rather "helps engender certain dispositions toward an ethical-political life that alter the affective and cognitive direction one takes on specific issues" (87)
(re)visitings - 1 Bloy Street, 1997
13 years ago 5 artists took up a residency in 1 Bloy St. Bristol - a condemned house on a condemned street - with the intention to make a performance. we worked by flashlight, in dark evenings behind eerily shuttered windows - it is freezing cold. we don costumes and play with dolls. we create acrobalances and hear a text spoken from the dark of another room. sometimes we write texts and share them in spattered sunlight. spring is coming and the abandoned gardens reveal hollyhocks, a shed full of aquariums and a house along the block infested with fleas. it feels anarchic and very convivial - we become a family, fictionally and otherwise. we are a family of children abandoned. we are also a company. we find a name - by word of mouth.
other artists join us to make installations and we have a makeshift kitchen, a kettle and a video camera. 2 weeks before we are due to show our performance Molly leaves abruptly. life was too much, too busy. the performance couldn’t function without Molly and our performance material became transformed into installations shown over a weekend open house in the summer. here you see details from my installations - entitled Dan Jenny Sally Molly and Dolly and Precious 7 layers
Friday, 19 November 2010
(re)visitings
After many attempts at trying to set up a website that would cost little and be easy to manage, I finally decided that I needed a simple web presence – one I could add to and edit really easily and would do what I needed it to at this time. So I have set up this blogspot and I have a specific use in mind for it, which is twofold:
Firstly, I want to digitally archive some images of my performances/installations from 1997 – 2009.
Secondly, I want to track my current PhD research by making simple entries about current thinking/reading. I’m not sure quite how the entries will take shape beyond the fact that each time I archive images from the past I will make an entry about what I am researching presently. So the double function takes the form of two strands of research – one from the past and the other in the present. The revisitings of past performances/installations will be archived chronologically from 1997 onwards. Where will the resonances/crossings be between past and present research? What happens when the past meets the present?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)